May 2007


From Lamar Alexander’s website:

Over the next three weeks, the Senate will be debating and voting on immigration reform legislation. During that time, this space on my website will be dedicated to keeping you up-to-date on the latest developments.

I voted against the immigration reform bill last year because it didn’t do enough to secure the border.

I’m examining this new bill carefully to make sure it secures the border before it does anything else. It’s inexcusable that there are 12 million illegal immigrants here today, with 1 million more coming each year. We have to fix this problem now. The status quo is unacceptable.

To earn my vote, the final version of this bill should include:

1. Securing the border before it does anything else.

2. Establishing a reliable worker identification system – so employers can know who’s legal and who isn’t and are held accountable if they hire illegal workers.

3. Reforming our system so it attracts the brightest minds from around the world to study here, work here and become Americans.

4. Making sure that immigrants learn English and American history and civics.

Friday, May 25, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sens. Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker today applauded a one year moratorium of a proposed change to the rules governing Medicaid program funding to states that would have forced significant cuts in services to Tennesseans. The Supplemental Appropriations bill that passed the Senate 80-14 on Thursday night included this key provision that would prevent implementation of the proposed rule for one year.
“This keeps the doors of important Tennessee hospitals open,” said Alexander, who – as a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee – voted for the amendment that imposed the one-year moratorium during committee debate on the Supplemental Appropriations bill. “Blocking this proposed rule is great news for the health of thousands of Tennesseans. Although I would have preferred passing this provision as part of a different bill, I’m glad we were able to get it done.”

“I’ve had serious concerns about the impact the proposed rule would have on the accessibility and quality of health care Tennesseans receive,” Corker said. “I’m pleased that we have been successful in suspending any cuts for at least a year, and look forward to working with the administration on a more constructive way to move ahead.”

In March, the senators wrote a joint letter to the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee expressing their concerns over the impact this particular proposal would have on 19 Tennessee hospitals, including 10 rural facilities, seven urban facilities and two safety net providers.

Under the proposed rule, only hospitals meeting a new definition of a “public” hospital would be eligible to use certified public expenditures (CPEs) that help states fund their Medicaid programs, which would have cut Medicaid funding to safety net providers in Tennessee. Based on analysis from the TennCare Bureau, which administers Tennessee’s Medicaid program, the proposed rule would cost Tennessee’s hospitals an estimated $1.3 billion over 5 years.

Thursday, May 24, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) made the following statement today after voting for the Iraq supplemental funding bill:
“After months of political posturing and non-binding resolutions on Iraq, I’m delighted to vote for a supplemental bill that will actually give General Petraeus and our troops on the ground the time, resources and support they need,” said Corker. “This supplemental also sends a clear message to the Iraqi government that we are serious about our expectation that they do those things necessary to take over their own destiny and maintain their own security.”

Here it is. This will (hopefully) end the debate. And I promise (not really) that these will be my last comments on the issue.

Are you ready?

ENFORCE THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE ON THE BOOKS!!!

There is no need for more legislation. Send the squatters back to the lands from whence they came. Stop spending money trying to come up with new and creative ways to convince the American people that Congress is actually trying to stop the flow of illegal immigrants and spend that money on actually getting rid of the ones who are already here. Stop giving them welfare. Stop educating their children. And, for heaven’s sake, stop giving them a free pass!

Here are Corker’s comments from his website:

Monday, May 14, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) made the following statement today in regards to the fiscal year 2008 earmarking process:
“I don’t believe there are very many Americans who have faith in the way the federal government spends their money, and abuses of the earmark system have no doubt contributed to an erosion of public confidence. I share this skepticism.

“The earmarking process is in transition, and I want to spend this first year helping shape earmark reforms and reviewing the entire appropriations process. For that reason, this first year our office is only requesting appropriations that meet the following guidelines: (1) Are in support of a clear federal mission; and (2) are explicitly authorized by federal legislation such as those Army Corps of Engineer projects that are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA); or (3) have won multi-year competitive grant awards through an authorized federal program.”

So, at least he’s doing something about the ridiculous earmarking practice, but, unfortunately, it’s not nearly enough. While I praise Corker for at least taking some sort of stand against the gross overspending going on in Washington, I much prefer Rep. Ron Paul’s strategy, who “will not give in to pressure to vote for bills that spend taxpayers’ money or that he feels violate the Constitution” (Wikipedia). This policy has earned him the nickname “Dr. No” on the Hill. And I like that.

NASHVILLE – Gov. Phil Bredesen and Rep. Matthew Hill congratulate Johnson City for earning a $10,000 Main Street Innovation Grant to develop gateway signs for the downtown district.

“This grant allows communities to get creative and pursue a forward-thinking approach to community development,” said Bredesen. “I applaud the leaders of Johnson City for taking advantage of the Main Street Innovation Grant to improve its downtown commercial district.”

The Main Street Innovation Grant, which requires communities to match 20 percent, supports the development of new, innovative projects, programs, activities and technology that exhibit best practices in downtown revitalization. The Johnson City grant will fund fabrication, installation and labor for two gateway signs.

“This grant will help improve the community’s downtown commercial district,” Rep. Hill said. “I want to commend city leaders for recognizing the importance of this project and making the necessary plans to secure funding.”

He added, “This funding support will be a great benefit to the city and provide much needed improvements to preserve Johnson City’s historic downtown.”

“I am pleased to award these Main Street Communities with funding to improve their historic downtown districts,” said ECD Commissioner Matthew Kisber. “Making an investment in these communities helps our state maintain a positive business climate, creating an environment where companies can grow and succeed, and providing more Tennesseans with higher-paying, better-skilled jobs.”

The Main Street program is a statewide program that provides communities with technical assistance and guidance in developing long-term strategies that promote economic development, historic preservation and growth in traditional commercial districts across Tennessee. The program requires certified Tennessee Main Street communities to meet National Accreditation standards which include broad-based community support for the program, a comprehensive work plan, a sufficient operating budget and adequate staff and volunteer support.

The Main Street “Four-point Approach to Downtown Revitalization” is a comprehensive, incremental, self-help economic strategy that focuses on developing public-private partnerships to enhance community livability and job creation, while maintaining the historic character of their downtown district. Tennessee Main Street is a coordinating program of the National Main Street Center, a program of the National Trust for Historic Preservation.

For more information on the Tennessee Main Street Program, visit ECD online.

NASHVILLE – State Representative Matthew Hill (R-Jonesborough) co-sponsored legislation that sets the minimum period of incarceration for rape of a child at 25 years as opposed to current law, which dictates a minimum of 15 years. Hill, who is known as a strong advocate for tougher laws against rapists and for victim’s rights legislation, said, “We must target those who prey on children and make absolutely sure that they are serving at least 25 years.”

The measure gained the House’s approval last night, as lawmakers voted unanimously to implement the law. Hill said he was proud to have been a part of the decision-making process, because it means so much to his district. “This truly is a victory for our children,” he stated.

“We need to take bold action to protect our children from the pain of rape or child sexual abuse,” Hill continued. “There should be no “good time” or breaks in sentencing for these offenders. This legislation is a big step in the right direction to place those who harm children behind bars and make sure they pay the full penalty of law for their horrendous actions.”

At the suggestion of my friend and reader, Ryan, I have been browsing Senator Bob Corker’s website for some information on what he’s been doing in Washington. While looking for some evidence that he has been fighting against the ridiculous spending that has been going on in Washington for years, I found some other interesting information. From Corker’s news page:

Thursday, February 08, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) today praised U.S. Senator Lamar Alexander’s (R-TN) proposed amendment that would restore $100 million to the Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) which was cut from the Joint Funding Resolution for government programs that passed the U.S. House of Representatives on January 31:
“As mayor of Chattanooga, I saw firsthand the tremendous academic gains students made when teachers were paid for their performance. We worked to provide bonuses to high-performing teachers in our schools with the greatest needs and in a short time found that those nine schools outperformed the other schools in our system.

“I applaud Senator Alexander for introducing this amendment to restore level funding to the Teacher Incentive Fund and believe that by applying innovative programs like this one, we can improve student achievement in Tennessee and across our country.”

If we’re interested in cutting spending, my suggestion would be to stop funding programs that are not allowed by the Constitution. Such as education.

Thursday, February 01, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) today made the following statement after voting in favor of H.R. 2, the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007, which passed the Senate by a vote of 94 to 3:
“I believe we’ve passed a minimum wage bill that helps workers and protects their jobs. The federal minimum wage hasn’t increased in a decade, and it’s time we provided this increase for working families.

“We’ve worked to ensure that the bill provides revenue neutral relief for the small businesses most affected by the cost of the increase. That means we’re providing tax relief without creating a larger deficit.

“I’m particularly glad this bill includes a tax credit for employing veterans who are disabled as a result of their service in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is an appropriate way to support our troops and their families who have sacrificed so much.”

Again, how about sticking with the Constitution and not mandating how much employers are allowed to pay their employees?

A hard and fast way to cut spending in Washington would be, again, to follow the Constitution and actually limit what the Federal Government is allowed to do (and spend).

So, do me a favor and show me how Corker is making real efforts to reduce spending. I’m fair…I’ll praise him if he’s worthy.

I’m intrigued by Ron Paul. I won’t yet say that he’s my guy, but I’m certainly interested. Here’s some info on his views from his website:

Debt and Taxes

Working Americans like lower taxes. So do I. Lower taxes benefit all of us, creating jobs and allowing us to make more decisions for ourselves about our lives.

Whether a tax cut reduces a single mother’s payroll taxes by $40 a month or allows a business owner to save thousands in capital gains taxes and hire more employees, that tax cut is a good thing. Lower taxes allow more spending, saving, and investing which helps the economy – that means all of us.

Real conservatives have always supported low taxes and low spending.

But today, too many politicians and lobbyists are spending America into ruin. We are nine trillion dollars in debt as a nation. Our mounting government debt endangers the financial future of our children and grandchildren. If we don’t cut spending now, higher taxes and economic disaster will be in their future – and yours.

In addition, the Federal Reserve, our central bank, fosters runaway debt by increasing the money supply – making each dollar in your pocket worth less. The Fed is a private bank run by unelected officials who are not required to be open or accountable to “we the people.”

Worse, our economy and our very independence as a nation is increasingly in the hands of foreign governments such as China and Saudi Arabia, because their central banks also finance our runaway spending.

We cannot continue to allow private banks, wasteful agencies, lobbyists, corporations on welfare, and governments collecting foreign aid to dictate the size of our ballooning budget. We need a new method to prioritize our spending. It’s called the Constitution of the United States.

American Independence and Sovereignty

So called free trade deals and world governmental organizations like the International Criminal Court (ICC), NAFTA, GATT, WTO, and CAFTA are a threat to our
independence as a nation. They transfer power from our government
to unelected foreign elites.

The ICC wants to try our soldiers as war criminals. Both the WTO and CAFTA could force Americans to get a doctor’s prescription to take herbs and vitamins. Alternative treatments could be banned.
The WTO has forced Congress to change our laws, yet we still face trade wars. Today, France is threatening to have U.S. goods taxed throughout Europe. If anything, the WTO makes trade relations worse by giving foreign competitors a new way to attack U.S. jobs.

NAFTA’s superhighway is just one part of a plan to erase the borders between the U.S. and Mexico, called the North American Union. This spawn of powerful special interests, would create a single nation out of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, with a new unelected bureaucracy and money system. Forget about controlling immigration under this scheme.

And a free America, with limited, constitutional government, would be gone forever.

Let’s not forget the UN. It wants to impose a direct tax on us. I successfully fought this move in Congress last year, but if we are going to stop ongoing attempts of this world government body to tax us, we will need leadership from the White House.

We must withdraw from any organizations and trade deals that infringe upon the freedom and independence of the United States of America.

War and Foreign Policy

The war in Iraq was sold to us with false information. The area is more dangerous now than when we entered it. We destroyed a regime hated by our direct enemies, the jihadists, and created thousands of new recruits for them. This war has cost more than 3,000 American lives, thousands of seriously wounded, and hundreds of billions of dollars. We must have new leadership in the White House to ensure this never happens again.

Both Jefferson and Washington warned us about entangling ourselves in the affairs of other nations. Today, we have troops in 130 countries. We are spread so thin that we have too few troops defending America. And now, there are new calls for a draft of our young men and women.

We can continue to fund and fight no-win police actions around the globe, or we can refocus on securing America and bring the troops home. No war should ever be fought without a declaration of war voted upon by the Congress, as required by the Constitution.

Under no circumstances should the U.S. again go to war as the result of a resolution that comes from an unelected, foreign body, such as the United Nations.

Too often we give foreign aid and intervene on behalf of governments that are despised. Then, we become despised. Too often we have supported those who turn on us, like the Kosovars who aid Islamic terrorists, or the Afghan jihads themselves, and their friend Osama bin Laden. We armed and trained them, and now we’re paying the price.

At the same time, we must not isolate ourselves. The generosity of the American people has been felt around the globe. Many have thanked God for it, in many languages. Let us have a strong America, conducting open trade, travel, communication, and diplomacy with other nations.

Border Security and Immigration Reform

The talk must stop. We must secure our borders now. A nation without secure borders is no nation at all. It makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad when our own front door is left unlocked. This is my six point plan:

Physically secure our borders and coastlines. We must do whatever it takes to control entry into our country before we undertake complicated immigration reform proposals.
Enforce visa rules. Immigration officials must track visa holders and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law. This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11 terrorists had expired visas.
No amnesty. Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in our country illegally. That’s a lot of people to reward for breaking our laws.
No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules. But taxpayers should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools, roads, and social services.
End birthright citizenship. As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S. illegally will remain strong.
Pass true immigration reform. The current system is incoherent and unfair. But current reform proposals would allow up to 60 million more immigrants into our country, according to the Heritage Foundation. This is insanity. Legal immigrants from all countries should face the same rules and waiting periods.

Privacy and Personal Liberty

The biggest threat to your privacy is the government. We must drastically limit the ability of government to collect and store data regarding citizens’ personal matters.

We must stop the move toward a national ID card system. All states are preparing to issue new driver’s licenses embedded with “standard identifier” data – a national ID. A national ID with new tracking technologies means we’re heading into an Orwellian world of no privacy. I voted against the Real ID Act in March of 2005.

To date, the privacy focus has been on identity theft. It was Congress
that created this danger by mandating use of the standard identifier (currently your SSN) in the private sector. For example, banks use SSNs as customer account identifiers because the government requires it.

We must also protect medical privacy. Right now, you’re vulnerable. Under so-called “medical privacy protection” rules, insurance companies and other entities have access to your personal medical information.

Financial privacy? Right now depositing $10,000 in your local bank will generate a “suspicious activity report” to the federal government.

And then there’s the so-called Patriot Act. As originally proposed,

Expanded the federal government’s ability to use wiretaps without judicial oversight;
Allowed nationwide search warrants non-specific to any given location, nor subject to any local judicial oversight;
Made it far easier for the government to monitor private internet usage;
Authorized “sneak and peek” warrants enabling federal authorities to search a person’s home, office, or personal property without that person’s knowledge; and
Required libraries and bookstores to turn over records of books read by their patrons.

I have fought this fight for many years. I sponsored a bill to overturn the Patriot Act and have won some victories, but today the threat to your liberty and privacy is very real. We need leadership at the top that will prevent Washington from centralizing power and private data about our lives.

Property Rights and Eminent Domain

We must stop special interests from violating property rights and literally driving families from their homes, farms and ranches.

Our country’s founders would roll over in their graves if they saw the takings clause in the Fifth Amendment used to justify booting people out of their homes for the profit of private developers and tax-hungry local governments. The Supreme Court’s Kelo decision said government power could be used to condemn private homes and churches to benefit a huge pharmaceutical corporation and a large property developer.

Today, we face a new threat of widespread eminent domain actions as a result of powerful interests who want to build a NAFTA superhighway through the United States from Mexico to Canada.

We also face another danger in regulatory takings: Through excess regulation, governments deprive property owners of significant value and use of their properties – all without paying “just compensation.”

Property rights are the foundation of all rights in a free society. Without the right to own a printing press, for example, freedom of the press becomes meaningless. The next president must get federal agencies out of these schemes to deny property owners their constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property.

I like the fact that many on Capital Hill refer to him as “Dr. No,” because he will not vote in favor of any bill that is not expressly allowed within the Constitution. For more info visit Ron Paul’s Campaign Site or Paul’s Congressional Site.

Here’s a breakdown of the Senate Amnesty bill that will be on the floor Monday. Judge for yourself:

Border Security and Immigration Reform Act of 2007

Title I

Title I requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to certify that the triggers are met before the Title IV (Guest Worker) and Title VI (Z visa ) programs can begin, with the exception of probationary status for Z workers and the programs for agricultural workers.

• Triggers include:
o 18,000 (CBP) Border Patrol hired
o Construction of 200 miles of vehicle barriers and 370 miles of fencing
o 70 ground-based radar and camera towers along the southern border
o Deployment of 4 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and supporting systems
o The ending of catch-and-release
o Resources to detain up to 27,500 aliens per day on an annual basis
o The use of secure and effective identification tools to prevent unauthorized work.
o The receiving and processing and adjudicating of applications for Z status.

• Title I also includes authorities and resources to augment border security including:
o physical infrastructure along the border
o additional field and investigative agents
o comprehensive plans and studies of the border region
o revisions to law enforcement techniques and enhanced authorities.

Title II
Title II provides for interior enforcement of immigration laws.

• The stiffening of laws and penalties relate to:
o the detention of criminal aliens
o the definition of aggravated felony
o gang violence
o passport, visa, and immigration fraud, including marriage fraud
o the streamlining of background checks for immigration status

• Other provisions include language regarding:
o Increased penalties for illegally entry and reentry
o encouraging aliens to depart voluntarily
o prohibiting aliens to possess firearms
o alternatives to detention
o state and local law enforcement reimbursement and training

Title III
Title III addresses workplace enforcement by increasing penalties, revising and making mandatory a system of electronic employment verification, and promoting information sharing.

• This Title designs a worksite enforcement system that relies on electronic employment verification and a reduced list of documents that may be presented to employers to prove identity and work eligibility.
o Also increases penalties significantly over current law for unlawful hiring, employment, and recordkeeping violations.

• Verification of employees: As of the date of enactment, employers in national security-related industries, industries involving critical infrastructure, and federal contractors to electronically verify employees, including new hires and/or current employees may be required to verify individuals, with additional employers or industries added after 6 months.
o All employers would be required to electronically verify new hires within 18 months of enactment, or on the date on which the Secretary certifies that the system is operational.
o Once the system is implemented, all employers would be required to verify all current employees within by 3 years after enactment.

• Structure of the EEVS: After the date of hire but no later than the first day of employment, the employer must transmit to the EEVS via the Internet the data that the employer has taken from the worker’s identity and work eligibility documents.

• Inconclusive determinations: Where the EEVS cannot conclusively determine the status of a worker’s eligibility, a further action notice is issued and the individual must contact the appropriate federal or state agency to initiate resolution of status and the individual continues to work while the agency resolves his or her status.

• Final nonconfirmation: If the employer has received a final non-confirmation regarding an individual, the employer must terminate the employment of the individual, unless the individual files an administrative appeal of a final non-confirmation notice within 15 days.

• Data and Information Sharing: The Commissioner of Social Security must provide the following information to the Secretary of DHS regarding data contained within the Social Security database as in relates to employment verification.

• Fraud and tamper resistant social security cards: Not later than 180 days after date of enactment, the Commissioner is required to begin work to administer and issue fraud-resistant, tamper-resistant Social Security cards.

Title IV

Title IV establishes a new temporary Y worker program to address future labor needs of temporary foreign workers and discourage future illegal employment of undocumented individuals. The title also includes measures to protect the rights of U.S. and foreign workers and prevent the U.S. employer from abusing the program.

• Structure of new visa programs: This title creates a new future temporary worker program for workers who are coming to the U.S. to perform temporary job that the U.S. employer is unable to fill. It provides for:
o non-seasonal Y temporary worker (Y-1 visa)
o seasonal temporary worker

Y-2A for agricultural workers, sheepherder, goat herders, and dairy workers

Y-2B for non-agricultural workers; and

o their spouses and minor children (Y-3 visa).

• Matching Willing Workers with Willing Employers: All Y workers must be matched to a “willing employers” through an electronic database in order to qualify for a Y worker visa.

• Families of Y visa holders: can only accompany Y workers if the worker can:
o show proof of valid medical insurance and
o demonstrate that the wages of the principal Y nonimmigrant(s) are 150% above poverty level for the household size.
o Spouses and children who do not qualify for Y-3 visa may be admitted under other nonimmigrant status.

• Period of admission: A Y-1 worker can be admitted for a two year period that can be renewed twice if that worker spends a period of one year outside the United States between each admission.
o A Y-1 accompanied by dependents are afforded a single two year visa, non-renewable.
o Workers with Y-2A and Y-2B visa qualify for 10 month visas; no extensions may be granted.

• Permanent Bar: Y worker who fails to timely depart is permanently barred from any future immigration benefit.

• Wage: The employer must attest that the Y worker will be paid not less than the greater of the actual wage paid by the employer to all other similarly situated workers or the “prevailing competitive wage.”

• Numerical Limitation: The Y-1 visa program has an initial cap of 400,000 with yearly adjustments based on market fluctuations.
o There are no numerical limitations for Y-2A while the Y-2B visas are initially capped at 100,000 with yearly adjustment based on market fluctuations.
o The market-based fluctuation is adjusted every 6 months during the fiscal year.
o The Y-3 visa for spouses and minor children limit may not exceed 20% of annual limit for Y-1 visas.
o A newly created Standing Commission will make recommendations to Congress regarding the Y visa numerical cap for each fiscal year following the initial year of the program

Title V
Title V restructures and rebalances the current system by which green cards are distributed.

• Rebalancing of Immigrant Visa Allocation: Resets the number of family-based, family backlog, merit-based immigrants, and eventual Z immigration green cards.
o The family categories are less than under current law since several of the extended family categories are reduced, while the merit-based is increased over the current employment-based levels after the processing of the family-based backlog.
o An annual total of 440,000 visas are allotted to process the backlog of family-based categories eliminated.
o It is estimated that the family backlog cases can all be processed in 8 years.
o An annual total of 10,000 visas are set aside for exceptional Y workers.

• Merit Based Points System: The current employment based green card system will be replaced by a merit based points system.

• Reducing Chain Migration and Permitting Petitions by Nationals: Elimination and reconfiguring of the following family-based preference categories:
o First: Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Citizens
o Second: Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents other than spouses and minor children of permanent residents
o Third: Married Sons and Daughters of Citizens
o Fourth: Brothers and Sisters of Adult Citizens
o Sets cap of 40,000 per fiscal year on category for parents of U.S. citizens.
o Sets cap of 87,000 per fiscal year on the second preference category for spouses and children of permanent residents.

• Elimination of Backlog: If the family-based visa petition in the eliminated category is filed before May 1, 2005, the petition can be processed under the prior law within 8 year.

Title VI

This title provides a new visa for most individuals currently living within the U.S. illegally.

• Creates a new four-year, renewable “Z” nonimmigrant visa to address the undocumented population within the U.S. The visa is split up into three groups:
o a principal or employed alien (Z-1),
o the spouse or elderly parent of that alien (Z-2),
o and the minor children of that alien (Z-3).

• Cut off Date: In order to be eligible for this visa, one must have been illegally present within the U.S. before January 1, 2007.

• Fees and Penalties: To apply, an alien seeking Z-1 status must be currently employed and pay fees and penalties totaling $5,000 (less for derivative Z’s) to be eligible for a green card under the merit-based system.

• Probationary, the Permanent Z Status: Once an applicant submits a completed application, fingerprints, and is cleared by one-day background checks he will receive probationary benefits which can eventually be converted to a Z nonimmigrant status after all background checks are clear and the triggers set forth in Title I are achieved.

• LPR Status: A Z-1 nonimmigrant may adjust status to lawful permanent residence after the family backlog under Title V is eliminated if the Z applicant:
o Satisfies the merit requirements in the points schedule set forth in Title V.
o files the application for adjustment in the Z-1’s country of origin and
o pays a penalty of $4,000.

• DREAM ACT: Individuals under the age of 30 that were brought to the United States out of their own control as a minor are eligible to receive their green card after 3 years rather than 8.

Title VII
Title VII includes a number of miscellaneous provisions involving assimilation, including increased funding for the office of citizenship and integration ($100M)

Did you notice the “Z” visas? The visas that are unlimited in number and, apparently, renewable from now until forevermore? Oh, that’s brilliant. Great for our healthcare and welfare systems…
This is nothing more than a comprehensive plan to reward lawbreakers and I am absolutely appalled that President Bush and Presidential wannabe John McCain are actually supporting this nonsense.

Next Page »